Andrew Sharpless: – working with Bloomberg. And then I went away and I thought about a conversation I had had in Geneva with the Ambassador to the World Trade Organization, Mr. He listened to me very respectfully talk about how there were all kinds of measures of serious problems in the ocean.

Therefore became very clear in my experience how the more elements for the work really work in tandem to have a broader impact

And he generally told you… we have a good billion people in Asia to feed. The west has been overfishing the latest seas for a long time. We shall rating our change. And that i left perception which i had really mishandled new appointment. Right here, I had a message which had been that individuals could have a lot more eating regarding a refreshing ocean. I got entirely don’t build him remember that end in he read me personally supplying the form of conventional maintenance content that is an important one but it is simply only about biodiversity safeguards.

You to definitely forced me to see, well, hold off a moment, we can measure that which we do in the a medical metric which is the restaurants property value a good reconstructed water, the food financial support from remodeled ocean. Just how many edibles you will definitely we supply out of a reconstructed ocean? I titled Bloomberg backup and i also told you, hold off a minute, you will find a new suggestion. And you can let’s talk about which food, meals metric.

Melissa Wright: You were able to bring back that epiphany and help develop en fantastisk lГ¤sning what’s now a 3-country effort around overfishing. And I saw this work in action and in a recent trip to Brazil and was so impressed and inspired. And one of the side trips that we went on when I was in Brazil was to Itajai, and which I understand is one of the largest commercial fishing ports in Brazil.

Andrew Sharpless: They’re surprising big, aren’t they? I mean you – the audience should understand we’re not talking about like two guys in a little, you know, 15-foot skiff.

Melissa Wright: And Monica, the Brazilian rep from Oceana was telling me about how there was a lack of information, now, about what those boats are bringing in, which species, how much, when, and where they’ve been fishing because the country stopped monitoring their landings or their catch a few years ago. Can you speak to what impact that has had on the fisheries in Brazil and the work of Oceana?

Andrew Sharpless: So I’ve taken that same trip with you and it’s very impressive. The scale of our ability to catch ocean fish is enormous. And you see it as you go down that river and you’ll see these vessels that are stories and stories high – four or five or six stories high. So amazingly Brazil has collected no data on its own fisheries since 2008. Brazil’s had a kind of a budget crisis in that year. One of the ways they saved money was by cancelling all data collection efforts on fishery catches.

Wu

And so using, you are sure that, the couples there we have been now get together landings data inside the a keen official and you can credible method and you may revealing you to definitely up. Plus they are today event research towards on forty% of total fishery hook.

Andrew Sharpless: Yeah. Which is a pretty basic step, we can all see how that starts to set the conditions for, you know, scientific and sensible management. We’ve just launched together with this little enterprise called Google, and Sky Truth, an NGO, is our other partner. It’s called Global Fishing Watch. And your listeners can go to .